International Conference Modes of Thinking, Ways of Speaking (April 2017)
We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
105066 Moscow Staraya Basmannaya st., 21/4
tel.: +7 (495) 772-95-90 *22682
International Conference Modes of Thinking, Ways of Speaking (April 2017)
Edited by: A. F. Filippov, N. Farkhatdinov.
Higher School of Economics, National Research University, 2020.
Aleksandr Begrambekov.
Russian Sociological Review. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 57-81.
In bk.: The Future of the State. NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2020. Ch. 2. P. 39-64.
Shumilina V.
Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2020
We seek not only to be justified in our beliefs, but also to justify our beliefs to one another. While traditional epistemology has focused on the former kind of justification (viz. individual epistemic justification), it is through the latter kind (viz. interpersonal epistemic justification) that our most successful forms of enquiry make progress. Contrary to an influential reductionist view, I argue that interpersonal epistemic justification cannot be explained in terms of individualistic epistemic concepts such as (individual) justification or knowledge. Instead, it is a form of collective deliberation which allows us to place one another under irreducibly second-personal epistemic obligations.